Legal Opinion
Bradley v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 6, 1968No. 67 C 239(3)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REGAN, District Judge.
In this action brought by eight employees of General Motors Corporation, under Section 9 of the Universal Military Training Act, Section 459, 50 U.S.C. *482War App., all parties have filed motions for summary judgment.
Plaintiffs seek judgment for the amount of a paid absence allowance credit provided for under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement effective November 10, 1964. For reasons stated infra, we sustain defendant’s motion for summary judgment and deny the motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment.
The facts have been stipulated.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Magma Copper Company, San Manuel Division, a Corporation v. Stephen R. Eagar, Ray F. Stephens, James v. Mork, and Levi D. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Morton v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Earl R. Foster v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Earl R. Foster v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973