Legal Opinion
Morton v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided November 17, 1967No. 67 C 175(3)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGAN, District Judge.
This action, brought under Section 9 of the Universal Military Training Act, 50 U.S.C., War Appendix, Section 459, seeks recovery of vacation status and vacation pay to which plaintiff is allegedly entitled. The United States Attorney is acting for plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of Section 9(d) of the Act, Section 459(d) 50 U.S.C., War App. The facts have been stipulated and as so stipulated are found by the Court.
Robert Morton was originally employed by Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company on September 25, 1950, in the position of electrician…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Wil-Low CafeteriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- James Alvado v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert E. Morton v. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Bradley v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1968
- Barry v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
- Messina v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1970
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1970