Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Dailey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 2020No. 1ag/19Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Jonathan Christian Dailey, Misc. Docket AG No. 1, September Term 2019. Opinion by Raker, J. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT – DISCIPLINE – DISBARMENT – Respondent Jonathan Christian Dailey violated the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.6(a) and 8.4(a), (c), and (d) and the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-308.4(a), (c), and (d) when he solicited, received, and mismanaged financial transactions from a client shortly after the client received her settlement. Respondent took advantage of his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AngstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API