Legal Opinion

Saigh v. Busch

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 9, 1966No. 50622PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STORCKMAN, Judge.

This purports to he a shareholders’ derivative action in two counts; the counts were tried and appealed separately. A judgment adverse to the plaintiffs on count 2, involving charges that excessive compensation had been paid to the individual defendant as a corporational officer, was affirmed by the St. Louis Court of Appeals in Saigh ex rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Busch, Mo.App., 396 S.W.2d 9. This court is concerned solely with count 1 by which the plaintiffs Fred Saigh and Elizabeth Saigh, for themselves as shareholders of the defendant Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Saigh Ex Rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. BuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Putnam v. Juvenile Shoe CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Gruenewaelder v. WintermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Maynard v. Doe Run Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. MoultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Crow v. Newspaper Dealer Supply, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
  3. Herbik v. RandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Ruetz v. ToppingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Virgil Kirchoff Revocable Trust dated 06/19/2009 Benjamin Kirchoff and Michael Wenzel, Co-Trustees of the Virgil Kirchoff Revocable Trust dated 06/19/2009 Fairlyn Forsyth Kirchoff Mooradian and The Kirchoff Limited Partnership v. Moto, Inc., Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API