Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 17, 1925PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Suit in equity by a minority stockholder to compel directors to restore to the corporate treasury moneys paid out as a bonus or deferred salaries to officers and employees of the corporation, including certain of such directors. Judgment below was for defendants and plaintiff has appealed to this court.

Defendant Juvenile Shoe Corporation is organized under the laws of Missouri, and was made a defendant because said corporation is said to be under the domination and control of the other defendants, composing its board of directors, who "would refuse to institute any action for relief in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. McNulta v. Corn Belt BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Klein v. Independent Brewing Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Russell v. Henry C. Patterson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Endicott v. MarvelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Saigh Ex Rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. BuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Gallin v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Beard v. Achenbach Memorial Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API