Saigh Ex Rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Busch
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUDDY, Judge.
This is a stockholders’ derivative action. The petition before us for scrutiny is the second amended petition, as amended by plaintiffs, which is in two counts. The trial court, pursuant to Civil Rule 82.06, V.A.M.R., and to a stipulation signed by all the parties, ordered a separate trial of the issues raised under Count I and further ordered the judgment rendered under Count I, after hearing, to be deemed a final judgment for purposes of appeal within the meaning of § 512.020 RSMo 1959, Vol. 33 V.A.M.S. An appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment adverse.' to them on Count I of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Rita Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Caldwell v. EubanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Wolgin v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Cady v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Gieselmann v. StegemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. BarnessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Dawson v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.