Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hiltbrand

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2006No. 2006-0774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Eileen Brubeck Hiltbrand of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0069807, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1998.

{¶ 2} On January 9, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended complaint charging respondent with professional misconduct. Respondent filed an answer to the complaint, and a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline held a hearing on the complaint in December 2005. The panel then prepared written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation, all of which the board adopted.

Misconduct

Count I

{¶ 3} In March 2001,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. McCorkleOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. MazzoccoOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Association v. LindnerOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Rowell v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Rowell v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API