Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Mazzocco
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
With respect to case No. 95-48, we adopt the facts found by the board that relator did not maintain separate identifiable bank accounts for client funds, that he failed to maintain records of client funds coming into his possession, and that he used $88,136.94 in client trust funds for his personal and business expenses.
We do not adopt the board’s factual findings that respondent failed to file a final account or turn over assets in the Santarelli case or that he issued a check to the Gateway Family Home for insufficient funds because those allegations were a part of count two in case No.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KnowltonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RomaniwOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. HiltbrandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. MazzoccoOhio Supreme Court · 1999