Legal Opinion

Rowell v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2012No. 2011-1053Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Rowell v. Smith, 133 Ohio St.3d 288,

2012-Ohio-4313.] ROWELL, APPELLANT, v. SMITH, APPELLEE. [Cite as Rowell v. Smith, 133 Ohio St.3d 288,

2012-Ohio-4313.] In exercising its jurisdiction under R.C. 2151.23(A)(2), a juvenile court may issue temporary visitation orders that are in the best interest of the minor child during the litigation—Juv.R. 13(B)(1). (No. 2011-1053—Submitted May 8, 2012—Decided September 26, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, Nos. 10AP-675 and 10AP-708,

2011-Ohio-2809. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT In exercising its jurisdiction…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Harrold v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Pizza v. RayfordOhio Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API