Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rowell v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2012No. 2011-1053Published

1ConcurrenceMcGee Brown, J.

{¶ 28} I concur in the majority’s reversal of the court of appeals’ judgment and its reinstatement of the trial court’s June 30, 2010 contempt order and July 27, 2010 order enforcing contempt. However, I write separately because I would order appellee, Julie Ann Smith, to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for her blatant refusal to comply with this court’s July 7, 2011 order.

{¶ 29} Smith has effectively denied Rowell contact with the minor child for three years. She has not followed any of the visitation orders that have been issued and has appealed every contempt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cramer v. PetrieOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. HiltbrandOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API