Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Hayes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1999No. 98-2661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s pattern of neglecting entrusted legal matters coupled with his unwillingness to cooperate in related disciplinary investigations demonstrates his present unfitness to practice law and warrants an indefinite suspension from the practice of law. See Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 490, 683 N.E.2d 1148, 1149; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Emerson (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 375, 378, 704 N.E.2d 238, 240. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Further, because of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. EmersonOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HiltbrandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Toledo Bar Assn. v. HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. HayesOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API