Legal Opinion

Wojsko v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1980No. 804SC129PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment for that the materials considered by the trial judge demonstrate that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to each cause of action asserted. Assuming arguendo that the record before us does disclose issues of material fact with respect to the three claims asserted, summary judgment for defendants, nevertheless, was appropriate since the evidence in support of and in opposition to the motion affirmatively establishes that plaintiffs alleged claims are barred by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Davis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Braswell v. N. C. a & T State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. MacDonald v. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kawai America Corp. v. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Atlantic Coast Conference v. University of MarylandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Huyck Corp. v. C. C. Mangum, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. McInnis v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
  5. Stewart v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API