Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Graham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1985No. 8410SC435PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

All parties agree that the issue determined by the trial court and hence reviewable on appeal is whether the trial court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy is defeated by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Under that doctrine, the State cannot be sued without its consent. Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 309, 222 S.E. 2d 412, 417 (1976).

Consent is implicitly given, however, whenever the State enters into a valid contract. Id. at 320, 222 S.E. 2d at 423-24. In the event it breaches, the State has implicitly consented to be sued for damages on the contract.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. MacDonald v. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Wojsko v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paul L. Whitfield, P.A. v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API