Braswell v. N. C. a & T State University

Defendant assigns as error the statement “Marable had no intention of hitting any individual” contained in finding of fact No. 10; all of finding of fact No. 14; and all of finding of fact No. 16. The conclusions of law are the subject of exceptions Nos. 9 and 11, on which assignment of error No. 4 is based, for that they are inapplicable and contrary to applicable law.

Defendant candidly states in his brief that the sole conten tion on appeal is that the act of the security officer in firing his gun •downward to disperse the crowd was intentional and not negligent; therefore, no recovery can…