Legal Opinion
United States v. Bachman
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 11, 1985No. 84-C-0125PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court in this matter is the motion of the plaintiff, United States of America, for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Invoking the Court’s jurisdiction as established by 28 U.S.C. § 1345, the Government sues for the recovery of a debt incurred by the defendant, Susan A. Bachman. Specifically, the plaintiff, acting by and through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), alleges default upon a loan made to Filters Unlimited, Inc. (“Filters”). Although demand for payment was made upon…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,524 Carl Mintz and Shirley Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Lehman E. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. VIKING PUMP DIVISION, HOUDAILLE INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- S & M Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. BaerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kohlenberg v. American Plumbing Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Continental Bank N.A. v. EverettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- United States v. RollinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- General Motors Corp. v. Gallo GMC Truck Sales, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Megan Racine Associates, Inc. (In Re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Gritz Harvestore, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. v. L.H. Gruetzmacher, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.