Legal Opinion
CPT Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2004-EC1 v. Cin Kham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 6, 2012No. 108,384PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCombs, J.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
{ 1 On August 27, 2004, the appellants, Cin Kham and Ngul Liam Cing (Appellants), executed an adjustable rate note in favor of Encore Credit Corporation, a California Corporation (Encore). Contemporaneously, the Appellants executed a mortgage to secure the note. The mortgage names Mortgage Electronic - Registration - Systems, - Inc. (MERS), as the mortgagee and further states "MERS is a separate corporation that is acting solely as a nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns." Encore is identified as the Lender in this mortgage.
{2 On or about…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Robinson v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Glover v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Junk v. CitiMortgage, Inc. (In re Junk)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO. v. RICECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- Bank of America, N.A. v. MorrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.