Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. Cannady

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 1926No. 12018PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Brease.

The plaintiff brought action against the defendant, Cannady, for foreclosure of a mortgage of real estate, security for payment of a bond for money. He alleged that no part of the principal debt had been paid. The administrators of one Kroeg were also-made parties defendant.

The defendant, Cannady, in his answer, claimed that he had paid the sum of $1,400 on the principal of the debt, payment of which had been made to Kroeg, who had authority to collect same as plaintiff’s agent.

The cause was referred to the Master, who found in favor…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Smith v. . KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Bass v. American Products Export & I. Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Murphy v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Bacot v. South Carolina Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Drayton v. Industrial Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  2. Hahn v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Wilmington Suburban Water Corp. v. Board of Assessment for New Castle CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Miles v. FelkelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Twitty v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API