Curtis v. . Moore
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered December 5,1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of .plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. . The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The appellant Moore, being a purchaser for value, is entitled to be protected under the Recording Act.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered December 5,1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of .plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. . The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The appellant Moore, being a purchaser for value, is entitled to be protected under the Recording Act. (Bacon v. Van Schoonhoven, 87 N. Y. 446; Brewster v. Carnes, 103 N. Y. 556; Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 354; Ellis v. Horrman, 90 N. Y. 473.) The delivery of the note and the mortgage…
1Opinion of the CourtVann, J.
On the nineteenth of October, 1885, Edward S. Curtis conveyed an undivided one-sixth interest in certain ¡premises situate in the city of New York to John B. Armstrong by a deed dated that day and duly recorded October 26, 1885. At the same time the said Armstrong executed a purchase-money mortgage to Edward S. Curtis to secure a note for $2,000, given by the former to the order of the latter, of even date with the mortgage, and payable two years thereafter with interest at six per cent. This mortgage was duly recorded November 24th, 1885. March 29th, 1886, said Edward S. Curtis borrow-ed the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Runyan v. MersereauNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Sheldon v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Fryer v. . RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Purdy v. . HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Baldwin v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Jemzura v. JemzuraNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re MinbatiwallaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Sweet v. . HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.