Meyer v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBabber, Judge
The sole question here is as to the dutiability of containers filled with mustard when imported. The appellants refer to these containers as jugs, and their witness so characterized them. The Government refers to them as jugs or mugs.
The Board of General Appraisers, and we think aptly, considering their size and shape, refers to them as mugs, and they will be so regarded in this opinion. -
The mustard contained therein was assessed for duty under paragraph 235 of the act of 1913, concerning which no question arises here.
The mugs, however, were •classified .under paragraph 79 of the same act as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. HohnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- John P. Herber & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Julliard Fancy Foods Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Pez Haas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.