Legal Opinion

Vanderpool v. Celebrezze

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 23, 1965No. Civ. No. 64-51PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAST, District Judge.

This is a proceeding brought to review administrative denial of plaintiff’s application for establishment of a period of disability and for disability benefits under sections 216 (i) and 223(a) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423(a). The hearing examiner denied plaintiff’s claim after a hearing. The Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, Social Security Administration, refused to review, making the examiner’s disposition the “final decision” of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare and subject to this proceeding under section 205(g) of the Act, 42…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charles W. Teeter v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Thompson v. FlemmingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  3. Johnson v. FlemmingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  4. Hughes v. FlemmingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mullen v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  2. Cox v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
  3. (SS) Eilrich v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API