Legal Opinion
Charles W. Teeter v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 16, 1959No. 12604_1PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOCH, Circuit Judge.
This case arose out of denial, by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, of Charles W. Teeter’s claim for a period of disability, or disability “freeze” period, under the Social Security Act. If granted, the freeze in effect eliminates the no-income period of disability from the wage records, thus increasing the average monthly wage, and, therefore, the amount of future old age benefits.
The parties here agree that under the Act the period of disability, if allowed, would have to begin no later than June 30, 1948 (the last day on which Mr. Teeter could show that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aaron v. FlemingDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1958
- Dunn v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
- Fuller v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
- Hill v. FlemingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Hallard v. FlemingDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
3Cited by68 opinions
- Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Philip Kerner v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- John B. Branham v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare v. Edgar L. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- William H. Walston v. John W. Gardner, Sectretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.