Legal Opinion

Cox v. Celebrezze

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 30, 1965No. Civ. No. 64-155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAST, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this proceeding to review the denial of her application for establishment of a period of disability and for disability benefits under §§ 216 *1015(i) and 223(a) of the Social Security-Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416 (i) and 423(a).

This action follows complete administrative consideration of plaintiff’s claim, including a hearing before an examiner of the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, Social Security Administration, and a refusal by the Bureau’s Appeals Council to review the examiner’s denial of relief. That refusal to review made the examiner’s decision the final…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charles W. Teeter v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Johnson v. FlemmingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  3. Hughes v. FlemmingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
  4. Vanderpool v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles Luttrell Combs v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  2. Rosay v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1965
  3. Swope v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API