Legal Opinion

Bamlet Realty Co. v. Doff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1915No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Bamlet Realty Company against Louis Doff for rent and damages under a lease. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor defendant removed the cause to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case originated in justice’s court, where plaintiff declared on all of the common counts in assumpsit, and especially for use and occupation, and upon a written lease, filing a bill of particulars in which it claimed rent due under said written lease, dated February 10, 1910, for premises known as Nos. 601 and 602, Bamlet building, as follows:

*696

The plea was the general issue, with notice of eviction and surrender. The written lease in evidence was made by plaintiff, as party of the first part, and the defendant, as party of the second part, for a term of four years and six months from and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kuschinsky v. FlaniganMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cadman v. MarkleMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pridgeon v. Excelsior Boat ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Grove v. YouellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Smith v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Belle Isle Grill Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Dunton v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Stewart v. LawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bookstein v. DragunaitisMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. McGregor v. MooneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API