Legal Opinion

Grove v. Youell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by Mary E. Grove against Azlena Youell upon a bond. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

This action is upon a bond given by the defendant to the plaintiff. The bond recites that the defendánt, being in debt to the plaintiff, for the purchase price of certain lots in the city of Grand Rapids, in the sum of $4,000, agrees to pay that sum, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent., payable semi-annually, within five years from the date of the bond. The-bond further cites:

*286“ It is further agreed that the said Grove may occupy any room in the house that is on said lots, or any room in ■any house that may be built on said lots to take the place ■of the one that is now on them, that she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royce v. GuggenheimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Kinney v. FolkertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Balch v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Pridgeon v. Excelsior Boat ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Belle Isle Grill Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. General Convention of Congregational Ministers & Churches v. TorkelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Bamlet Realty Co. v. DoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Delmar Investment Co. v. BlumenfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Stewart v. LawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API