Legal Opinion

Dunton v. Sweet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1920No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent; McDonald (John S.), J. Assumpsit by Marian H. Dunton against Frank I. Sweet and another for rent. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

On March 3, 1918, plaintiff, Marian H. Dunton, leased to defendants, Frank I. Sweet and Leon S. Heth, individually, for the term of 38 months at $116.32'per month, .the two-story building and base*527ment known as 223 and 225 Bond avenue, Grand Rapids. There was also included in the lease the yard in the rear of the building. Mr. Heth testified:

“I repair motors and generators, magnetos as used on automobiles for electrical equipment. I repair just the electrical instruments, it is a special branch of the service. Mr. Sweet does storage battery work exclusively, and we are together because it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kuschinsky v. FlaniganMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wusthoff v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Clarke v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. New York State Investing Co. v. WolfAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  5. Graecen v. BarkerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re MathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Amsterdam Realty Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Ludwigsen v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Boran v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hatmaker v. Michigan Children's Aid SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API