Legal Opinion
Cadman v. Markle
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1889PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The-facts, and points' of counsel passed upon by the Court, are Btated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This suit was brought to recover for services rendered by plaintiff to defendant in getting up an organization to promote the Edison system of electric lighting, etc., in Michigan.
The declaration is on the common counts in assumpsit,'and also contains a special count as follows :
“ Eor that, whereas, heretofore, to wit, on the first day of July, A. D. 1886, at Detroit, in said county of Wayne, the defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $5,000 for the price and value of certain shares of stock, which defendant, by express contract, promised the plaintiff to deliver and pay to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whipple v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Pierce v. Estate of PaineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Ordon v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Isham v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- McCurdy v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.