Legal Opinion

Green River Canal Co. v. Thayn

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2003No. 20010357PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Plaintiff Green River Canal Company (GRCC) and Defendant Lee Thayn (Thajm) both own and operate irrigation canals in Green River, Utah. GRCC alleges that Thayn breached agreements made by the parties in 1952 to govern their shared use of certain water diversion facilities owned by Green River when Thayn built and began operating a small hydroelectric power generation facility that used water in excess of the amounts mentioned in the 1952 agreements. The trial court ruled in favor of GRCC, holding that the 1952 agreements are determinative as to both the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Nova Casualty Co. v. Able Construction, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Nielsen v. O'REILLYUtah Supreme Court · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Saleh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Encon Utah, LLC v. Fluor Ames Kraemer, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bodell Construction Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API