Legal Opinion
Fennell v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 13, 1996No. 15389PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
This appeal raises issues regarding whether supervisory police officers are entitled to certain pension and retirement benefits with respect to accrued sick leave and service credits for military time. The plaintiffs, James Fennell, Arthur A. Williams, Jr., and William C. Bracken, three retired police officers of the city of Hartford, brought an action in twelve counts against the defendants, the city of Hartford (city) and the pension commission of the city of Hartford (commission), seeking damages and other relief because of the defendants’ alleged improper refusal to pay them certain…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- John J. Brennan Construction Corporation, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Alexander v. Retirement BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Maturo v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Levesque v. Town of VernonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.