Legal Opinion

United States v. Bender

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 12, 1991No. 65,097; CM 8802589PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

This case requires us to consider whether the military judge erred when he admitted prior uncharged misconduct into evidence against appellant. Mil.R.Evid. 404(b), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. Appellant was charged with committing indecent acts upon his 10-year-old daughter. The alleged acts included fondling her breasts and vagina. To meet its burden of proof, the Government not only had to prove that the acts occurred but also “[t]hat the accused committed the act with intent to arouse, appeal to, or gratify the lust, passions, or sexual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. MannUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. MunozUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. CuellarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. BenderU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. TanksleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. People Ex Rel. Hatzel v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. United States v. LevittUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. HebertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API