Wolfsmith v. Marsh
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice in administering a hypodermic injection of sodium pentathol, plaintiff appeals.
Facts : * In 1953 plaintiff, a housewife 46 years of age, consulted defendant Dr. Barr, at which time she was given sodium pentathol on at least four occasions and showed no allergy to it, nor did she suffer harm from the injections. One such injection was given by defendant Dr. Marsh. All were given in her arm.
On August 3, 1954, plaintiff, while under the care of Dr. Barr, was admitted as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Bauer v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.