Baker v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence. From a judgment in favor of the defendant entered upon the verdict of the jury plaintiff appeals, contending that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the applicability of which under the circumstances is the sole question presented.
Appellant was engaged in mounting and inflating a new tire of respondent’s manufacture and while so doing a violent explosion occurred throwing the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Gherna v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Forry v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Davis v. Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.