Legal Opinion

Campos v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2019No. Docket 45591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGratton, Chief Judge

Ezequiel Adan Campos appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. Campos argues that the district court erred in summarily dismissing his post-conviction claims because he presented genuine issues of material fact as to his ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

*789 I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2016, pursuant to a plea agreement, Campos pled guilty to unlawful possession of a weapon, Idaho Code § 18-3316 . The district court imposed a unified term of five years with four years…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chaput v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Chaput v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Meraz v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Osborn v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. HollingsworthIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API