Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Young

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1948No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant had sexual intercourse with Agnes Jandres, the nineteen-year-old prosecutrix, on June 15, 1946, and on no other occasion. She gave birth to a child on February 25, 1947. Defendant in this prosecution was charged with fornication and bastardy and was found guilty of both. The testimony clearly convicts him of fornication. The question in this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient in law to support the finding of the jury that the child is the fruit of the coition of June 15, 1946, the only date on which defendant was intimate with the girl.

The difficulty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RexSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Souchek v. KarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. JodlowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Lonesome v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. HarbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. GromoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API