Commonwealth v. Gromo
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
The defendant has appealed from his sentence after conviction by a jury on a charge of fornication and bastardy. He contends that the court below erroneously refused both his motion in arrest of judgment and his motion for a new trial.
At the trial, Dr. Howard Quittner, a qualified pathologist of Washington, Pa., testified for the defendant that the results of blood grouping tests made of the defendant, the prosecutrix, and the child established that the defendant could not have been the father of the child. The integrity and competency of the physician, and the accuracy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. CoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. JodlowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Saks v. SaksNew York Family Court · 1947
- Commonwealth v. WattsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Commonwealth v. D'AvellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Houghton v. HoughtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re the Marriage of SchnecklothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Beck v. BeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.