Commonwealth v. Rex
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
Defendant was convicted of fornication and bastardy. The indictment charged sexual intercourse with prosecutrix on September 1, 1939 and the birth of the child on May 30,1940. The Commonwealth’s case rests solely upon the testimony of the prosecutrix, a, sixteen year old girl, obviously of limited mentality. This appeal questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of bastardy.
The birth of the child on May 30, 1940 is conceded and in the testimony there is the positive statement of the mother that defendant had sexual intercourse with her on September…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goater v. KlotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Muslera v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. BoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Krause v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Pauli v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. AriziniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.