Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rex

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1941No. Appeal, 184PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Defendant was convicted of fornication and bastardy. The indictment charged sexual intercourse with prosecutrix on September 1, 1939 and the birth of the child on May 30,1940. The Commonwealth’s case rests solely upon the testimony of the prosecutrix, a, sixteen year old girl, obviously of limited mentality. This appeal questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of bastardy.

The birth of the child on May 30, 1940 is conceded and in the testimony there is the positive statement of the mother that defendant had sexual intercourse with her on September…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goater v. KlotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Muslera v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. BoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Krause v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Pauli v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. AriziniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API