Commonwealth ex rel. Lonesome v. Johnson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
This is an appeal from a lower court order requiring the appellant to pay weekly support for Judith Lonesome’s two children, Lavance and Latía. Appellant *337contends that because petitioner admitted to relations with other men, she is incompetent to testify as to appellant’s paternity of the children. We find that the evidence supports a finding of paternity and therefore affirm the court below.
Judith Lonesome initiated proceedings in this case by filing a petition for support of her two children, Lavance, born May 30, 1970, and Latia, born October 26, 1971, naming appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. RexSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. HarbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. RankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Corra v. CollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Yentzer v. CarpenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- McConnell v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.