Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harbaugh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1962No. Appeal, 281PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

James Harbaugh was convicted by a jury of fornication and bastardy. lie was sentenced on both charges after motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial had been denied by the court below. This appeal followed.

The defendant contends that the evidence produced by the Commonwealth was insufficient to sustain a conviction, and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. If there is evidence to sustain the verdict, the court may not arrest judgment, but it may grant a new trial if the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Commonwealth v. Coyle,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParrottoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. CoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Commonwealth v. JodlowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Commonwealth v. WattsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. HayesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. HazlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API