Commonwealth v. Harbaugh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
James Harbaugh was convicted by a jury of fornication and bastardy. lie was sentenced on both charges after motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial had been denied by the court below. This appeal followed.
The defendant contends that the evidence produced by the Commonwealth was insufficient to sustain a conviction, and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. If there is evidence to sustain the verdict, the court may not arrest judgment, but it may grant a new trial if the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Commonwealth v. Coyle,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParrottoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. CoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. JodlowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. WattsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HayesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. HazlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.