Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 21, 1958No. 61971; protest 272628-K/7638 (Chicago)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to merchandise described on the invoice as “Music Box Components,” which the collector classified under the provision for parts of cigar or cigarette lighters in paragraph 1527 (c) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 52739, supplemented by T. D. 52836, carrying a duty assessment of 55 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly classifiable under the provision for music boxes, and parts thereof, not specially provided for, in paragraph 1541 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 48093, with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lador, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. Seawol Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. Naumes Forwarding Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Ronette Acoustical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pukel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Sherriff-Guerringue, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Lador, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API