Buckman v. Hatch
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was to foreclose the lien of a street assessment. Defendants answered without demurrer, and judgment passed for plaintiff. Defendant. Nicol appeals from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone.
The principal point which he here urges is, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This point is not waived by the failure to demur, nor is it cured by verdict or judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 434; Hurley v. Ryan, 119 Cal. 71; Bane v. Peerman, 125 Cal. 220; Locke v. Klunker, 123 Cal. 231; Hopkins v. Warner, 109 Cal. 133; Fay v. Reed, 128 Cal.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Locke v. KlunkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Schwiesau v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Weller v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hurley v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bell v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.