Legal Opinion
Ruff v. Manhattan Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 18, 1927No. 26,191PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the trial court refusing to set aside the service of the summons and complaint. -
The defendant, Manhattan Oil Company of Delaware, is a Delaware corporation. It has not been admitted or licensed to do business in this state under our laws relating to foreign corporations. Its principal business office was and is in Kansas City, Missouri. No property belonging to it has been attached or brought within the jurisdiction of the court.
Service of the summons and complaint ivas made on one J. P. Howe at Minneapolis in this state in September, 1926.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Ry. v. DeBowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Asphalt Roof Corp. v. ShanklandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Sivertsen v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938