Legal Opinion

Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

This is a motion made by the defendant Standard Oil Company (Indiana) to vacate the service of the summons herein. This defendant, hereinafter referred to as “ Indiana ” for convenience, is an Indiana corporation. It was organized under the laws of that State in 1889 and is engaged in refining, manufacturing, distributing and selling petroleum products. While it is duly qualified to transact business in various mid-western States, it is neither licensed nor qualified to do business as a foreign corporation in the State of New York. Indiana does not maintain any New…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph Walker & Sons v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gertsenstein v. Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  3. New York Automatic Canteen Corp. v. Keepel & Ruof, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API