Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Mackey

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1889No. 12915PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County dissolving an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an appeal from an order dissolving an attachment.

The complaint is founded on the following agreement:—

“This agreement, made and entered into on the twenty-eighth day of July, 1887, by and between C. E. Mackey, of the city and county of Los Angeles and state of California, who will he hereinafter referred to as the party of the first part, and Poindexter Dunn, of the county of *105St. Francis, and state of Arkansas, who will be hereinafter mentioned as the party of the second part,—
“Witnesseth: That the said second party having this day purchased from said party of the first part, as agent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Janin v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. New Haven Steam Saw-Mill Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  3. Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
  4. Donnelly v. StruevenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Lawton v. KielNew York Supreme Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API