Hamburger v. Halperm
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from an order dissolving an attachment. The complaint alleged that the defendant on March 1, 1913, had engaged plaintiffs as exclusive selling agents for his goods in California and several other states, agreeing that the plaintiffs should be entitled to seven and one-half per cent commission on all sales, however made, in New York or in the specified states, and that the contract of employment should remain in force for one year. The breach complained of was the alleged termination without cause of the plaintiffs’ agency in the month of August of that year, by which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GetchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Kerns v. McAulayIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
- Nichols v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Lowenberg v. L. Jacobson's SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Yosemite Growers Co-op Ass'n v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Eaton v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Anaheim National Bank v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.