Legal Opinion

State v. Drader

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1985No. Cr. 1074PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Terrance Drader appeals from his conviction of gross sexual imposition involving a child under the age of fifteen. Drader argues (1) that during final arguments the prosecutor improperly commented on Drader’s right to remain silent; (2) that the prosecutor committed misconduct in regard to the redirect examination of one witness and a conversation with a potential defense witness; and (3) that there is insufficient evidence to support the verdict. We affirm.

Drader’s argument that the prosecutor improperly commented during final argument is unfounded. The transcript…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SkjonsbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Stokes v. DaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. KirkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SchimmelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Fargo v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. CarriereNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. DraderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. GondermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API