Legal Opinion
State v. Gonderman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1995No. Cr. 940240PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
Norman Walter Gonderman appealed from a judgment of conviction based upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of four counts of gross sexual imposition. We affirm.
Gonderman was charged with engaging in sexual acts and having sexual contact with two minor children in violation of N.D.C.C. §§ 12.1-20-03(1)(d) and 12.1-20-03(2)(a). Gonderman applied for indigent defense services and was represented at trial by court-appointed counsel. A jury found Gonderman guilty on all four counts, and he appealed.
On appeal, Gonderman asserts that the trial court erred in denying his…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Grimes v. Ohio Edison CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. GibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Fargo v. HabigerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KunkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.