Legal Opinion

State v. Kirk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1973No. Cr. 440PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Judge.

The defendant was convicted ' of the crime of rape in the second degree. He has appealed to this court, alleging insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

The defendant was eighteen years of age and the complainant sixteen years of age when the alleged offense occurred. The information charges that the defendant had an act of sexual intercourse with the complainant by overcoming her resistance by force or violence, in violation of Section 12-30-06, N.D.C.C. The defendant admits that the complainant was not his wife, that he was eighteen years of age at the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ChampagneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. WernerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State v. OliverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DraderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API