State v. Kirk
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Judge.
The defendant was convicted ' of the crime of rape in the second degree. He has appealed to this court, alleging insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.
The defendant was eighteen years of age and the complainant sixteen years of age when the alleged offense occurred. The information charges that the defendant had an act of sexual intercourse with the complainant by overcoming her resistance by force or violence, in violation of Section 12-30-06, N.D.C.C. The defendant admits that the complainant was not his wife, that he was eighteen years of age at the time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ChampagneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. WernerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. OliverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DraderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1988