Legal Opinion
State v. Schimmel
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1987No. Cr. 1182PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Justice.
Roger Schimmel (Schimmel) appeals his jury trial conviction for driving a vehicle upon a highway with a blood-alcohol concentration of at least ten one-hundredths of one percent (.10%) by weight at the time of the performance of a chemical test and within two hours after driving, a violation of § 89-08-0!(l)(a), N.D.O.G. We affirm.
Schimmel alleges three errors occurred during his trial which mandate a reversal of his conviction and new trial. Schimmel asserts: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence testimony pertaining to an on-site A.L.E.R.T. chemical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asbridge v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MickoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. ThielNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Fargo v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.