Spanfelner v. Meyer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Respondent had judgment quieting his title to a parcel of land of less than one acre, which was part of a larger tract .conveyed to respondent’s brother by deed of appellant and his wife in 1928. In this transaction it is admitted that respondent’s brother was acting as agent and naked trustee for respondent and the property was subsequently conveyed to respondent by his brother. Appellant cross-complained, alleging that the parcel of land here in dis pute was included in the description in the deed by mutual mistake of the parties and praying for a reformation of the deed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKay v. LauristonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Rickards v. NoonanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Risdon v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Riley v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kern County Finance Co. v. IriartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. PrinceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Zellers v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. FieldsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Lux Land & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.