Legal Opinion

Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Fields

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 24, 1948No. 7854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

I. The Factual Situation in the Case W. C. Fields, the well-known actor, died Los Angeles County, California, on De cem'ber 25, 1946. Surviving him are his widow, Harriet V. Fields, to whom' he was married at San Francisco, in 1900, and a son, W.Claude Fields, born in 1903. At the time of his death, the marriage had not been dissolved, although the parties had not lived together, as husband and wife, since 1907. The mother and son lived at various times in New York and California prior to July 7, 1936. Since that time, they have made California their permanent home.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Gilbert v. DavidSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. District of Columbia v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1941

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nathaniel Thomas v. Ss Santa Mercedes and Prudential Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Fiddler v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Kidd v. Hilton of San Juan, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1966
  4. Chico v. Puerto Rico Electric Power AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
  5. Ex parte AufillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API