Legal Opinion
Smith v. Fourth Nat. Bank of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 17, 1940No. 29465PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Creek county. For convenience we shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the court below, the Fourth National Bank of Tulsa, plaintiff, and J. T. Smith, defendant.
The facts are substantially as follows: On August 18, 1933, the plaintiff brought suit for the balance due on a note given by the defendant, secured by real estate mortgages upon land located in Creek, Hughes, Seminole, Okfuskee, and McIntosh counties, and by another mortgage on land located in Chautauqua county, Kan. At about this same time a similar suit was filed in Kansas, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clem Oil Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wade v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Wynnewood Cotton Oil Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Harmon v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Hocker v. RackleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. Fourth Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Smith v. Fourth Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950